A steadier angle for orthodontic anchors? trial tests two insertion techniques
NCT ID NCT07715851
First seen Jul 21, 2026 · Last updated Jul 22, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial compares two techniques for placing temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in the jawbone to support orthodontic treatment. Healthy adults needing premolar extractions and maximum anchorage will receive both insertion methods on opposite sides of the mouth. The study measures which technique leads to better TAD survival, stability, and patient comfort over six months.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Temporary Anchorage Device (TAD) inserted via steady oblique-angled or two-step angulation technique
- What this could lead to
- If one technique proves superior, it could improve the success and comfort of orthodontic treatments that require temporary anchorage devices.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 28 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. The techniques are already in use, so the benefit may be modest.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BIMAXILLARY PROCLINATION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
Contact
Contact
Contact
Contact
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.