Which is safer for frail seniors: sedation or no sedation during feeding tube placement?

NCT ID NCT07758153

First seen Aug 11, 2026 · Last updated Aug 12, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looks at whether using sedation during a feeding tube procedure (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, or PEG) is safer than not using it in elderly patients who are very ill (classified as ASA IV). The main focus is on heart and lung complications within the first 24 hours after the procedure. Researchers will also track technical success, procedure time, hospital stay, and outcomes like mortality and readmission within 30 days. The findings could help doctors choose the best approach for this vulnerable group.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Sedation (or no sedation) during percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement
What this could lead to
If one approach proves safer, it could guide how feeding tubes are placed in frail older adults, reducing complications and improving recovery.
What could go wrong
This is an observational study, so it can't prove cause and effect. Results may be influenced by patient differences, and the small size limits generalizability.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ASA PHYSICAL STATUS IV are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Deglutition Disorders

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.