Which filling heals infected teeth better? new study aims to find out

NCT ID NCT07477171

First seen Mar 30, 2026 · Last updated May 16, 2026 · Updated 8 times

Summary

This study compares two materials used to refill root canals after a failed first treatment. About 58 adults with infected teeth will receive either standard gutta-percha or a newer material called MTA. Researchers will track healing, pain, and tooth color changes for one year to see which option works better.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ROOT CANAL THERAPY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • School of Medicine and Dentistry

    Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15705, Spain

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.