Robot surgeons vs. human hands: which is better for Women's surgery?
NCT ID NCT05613816
Summary
This study compared two types of minimally invasive surgery for uterine conditions: robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic surgery. Researchers followed 78 patients to see if one method resulted in shorter surgery times, less blood loss, fewer complications, or better recovery and satisfaction. The goal was to gather real-world data to help doctors and patients make better-informed decisions about surgical options.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for UTERINE DISEASES are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
University Hospital Tuebingen, Department of Women's Health
Tübingen, 72076, Germany
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.