Robot vs. electromagnetic: which lung biopsy method is more accurate?

NCT ID NCT06654271

First seen Nov 01, 2025 · Last updated Jun 16, 2026 · Updated 32 times

Summary

This study compares two modern methods for taking a tissue sample from a lung nodule: robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with a special 3D X-ray (cone beam CT) versus electromagnetic navigation with a different imaging technique (digital tomosynthesis). The goal is to see which approach more reliably obtains a sample that can confirm a diagnosis. The trial involves 440 adults scheduled for a lung nodule biopsy.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PERIPHERAL PULMONARY LESION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States

  • Rush University Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.