New hope for stroke shoulder pain: radiofrequency vs ultrasound

NCT ID NCT07131943

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two non-invasive therapies—radiofrequency (TECAR) and ultrasound—for treating shoulder pain in 45 stroke survivors. Participants had shoulder pain for at least 3 months after their stroke. Researchers measured pain, range of motion, and daily function to see which therapy worked better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

Radiofrequency (TECAR) therapy and ultrasound therapy

What this could lead to

If successful, this could show that radiofrequency therapy is a better option than ultrasound for easing shoulder pain and improving movement in stroke survivors.

What could go wrong

This is a small, completed study with only 45 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. It compares two existing treatments, so no breakthrough is expected.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for STROKE ( 3 MONTHS AFTER ONSET) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

hemiplegia Shoulder Pain stroke disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Faculty of Physical Therapy Delta University

    Gamasa, Egypt