Which oxygen monitor works best for newborns? study finds out.
NCT ID NCT06637917
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested two different pulse oximeters (devices that measure oxygen levels and heart rate) on 120 newborns to see which one worked better. The goal was to compare how quickly and accurately each device got a stable heart rate reading compared to a standard ECG. The results could help hospitals choose the best monitor for newborns.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BIRTH, PRETERM are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
-
Cedars-Sinai
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
-
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63130, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a simple color change improve breathing support for preemies?
- Can skipping alcohol on a Newborn's cord prevent infection just as well?
- Can ultrasound maps of healthy hips help spot hip problems in newborns?
- Simple devices could take the ouch out of newborn blood tests
- New sensor could spot newborn infections before they turn deadly
- Breathe away the stress: simple exercise may calm NICU mothers