Testing baby monitors: which device spots trouble faster?
NCT ID NCT06637917
Summary
This study compared two different pulse oximeter devices used to monitor newborns, including babies born early. Researchers tested how quickly and accurately each device measured heart rate and oxygen levels, using a standard ECG monitor as the most accurate comparison. The goal was to see which device performed better and reduced false alarms in the delivery room.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for NEWBORN are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
-
Cedars-Sinai
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
-
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63130, United States
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.