Bracket battle: which braces system straightens teeth and perfects your smile faster?
NCT ID NCT07712055
First seen Jul 17, 2026 · Last updated Jul 17, 2026
Summary
This trial compares two types of braces brackets — the self-ligating Pitts21 system and the conventional MBT system — for straightening crowded upper front teeth and improving the curve of the smile (smile arc). Thirty people aged 13 to 40 with mild to moderate crowding who do not need tooth extractions will be treated and followed for 6 months. The goal is to see which system aligns teeth and shapes the smile more effectively.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- orthodontic bracket systems (Pitts21 self-ligating brackets and MBT conventional brackets)
- What this could lead to
- If one system proves faster or more effective, it could shorten treatment time or improve smile aesthetics for people with crowded teeth.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, short-term study (30 people, 6 months) comparing two established devices, so any advantage may be modest or not apply to all patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
30 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Mar 2024
- Finished
-
Jan 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
13 to 40 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * mild to moderate maxillary anterior irregularity * indication for non-extraction orthodontic treatment * presence of all permanent teeth up to the first molars * healthy periodontal status and good oral hygiene; and * age between 13 and 40 year Exclusion Criteria: * craniofacial anomalies or cleft lip/palate * hypodontia or hyperdontia * systemic diseases or bone disorders affecting tooth movement; * tooth size anomalies
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dental crowding are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Mangalore
Mangalore, Karnataka, 575001, India
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Digital vs. plaster: can 3D scans replace traditional dental casts?
- Do clear aligners protect tooth bone better than braces? a head-to-head trial
- Which bracket placement method gives the best smile? trial compares three techniques
- Can a simple jaw measurement predict extraction needs?
- New 3D-Printed aligners could make braces more precise
- Braces vs clear aligners: which straightens teeth faster?