Tracking recovery: which pelvic fracture treatment works best for seniors?
NCT ID NCT04182776
Summary
This study is observing 420 adults aged 65+ who have broken their pelvis due to bone fragility. Researchers will follow these patients for one year to compare how well they recover with surgical treatment versus non-surgical (conservative) care. The goal is to understand which approach leads to better mobility, less pain, and fewer complications.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PELVIC FRACTURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Cantonal Hospital Lucerne
RECRUITINGLucerne, Switzerland
Contact
-
Okayama medical hospital
RECRUITINGOkayama, Japan
Contact
-
Queen Mary Hospital
RECRUITINGHong Kong, Hong Kong
Contact
-
Radboud University Medical Center
TERMINATEDNijmegen, Netherlands
-
The Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus
RECRUITINGOttawa, Canada
Contact
-
University Hospital Leipzig
RECRUITINGLeipzig, Germany
Contact
-
University Medical Center Groningen
RECRUITINGGroningen, Netherlands
Contact
-
University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf
RECRUITINGHamburg, Germany
Contact
-
University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg-University
RECRUITINGMainz, 55131, Germany
Contact
Contact
-
University of Missouri
RECRUITINGColumbia, Missouri, 65203, United States
Contact
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.