Safer surgery for pelvic prolapse? study tests Mesh-Free option
NCT ID NCT07306715
Summary
This study is comparing two surgical techniques to repair pelvic organ prolapse after a hysterectomy. One technique uses a synthetic mesh to support the vaginal cuff, while the other uses stitches without mesh. Researchers want to see if the mesh-free method is as effective and possibly safer, by checking if the prolapse returns and how it affects quality of life one year after surgery.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GENITAL PROLAPSE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Kocaeli University, School of Medicine
RECRUITINGKöseköy, Kocaeli, 41380, Turkey (Türkiye)
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.