New study pits two pain blocks against each other for spine surgery relief
NCT ID NCT06398600
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two ultrasound-guided pain blocks—caudal block and quadratus lumborum plane block—in 111 adults undergoing lumbar spine surgery. The goal was to see which provides better pain relief and reduces the need for opioid painkillers. Researchers measured how long it took before patients first asked for extra pain medicine and their pain scores over 24 hours.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- ultrasound-guided caudal block and quadratus lumborum plane block (procedures)
- What this could lead to
- If one block proves better, it could offer more effective pain control after spine surgery, reducing the need for opioids.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study comparing two techniques; results may not apply to all patients or surgeries, and both blocks carry rare risks like infection or nerve injury.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
111 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
May 2024
- Finished
-
Sep 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 60 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult patients (18-60 years old), of either gender undergoing elective lumbar spine fixation surgery. 2. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Include patients who refuse. 2. Patients with contraindications to regional anesthesia (eg, local infection at site of injection, coagulation abnormalities). 3. Patients with spinal deformities or previous lumbar disc surgeries. 4. Allergy to local anesthetics, mental disorders as well as drug abuse. 5. BMI more than 35
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Facet joint hypertrophy are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Fayoum University hospital
El Fayoum Qesm, Faiyum Governorate, 63514, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a new bone graft match the gold standard for spinal fusion?
- Can a growth factor from donor bone improve spinal fusion?
- Can a One-Day mindset workshop stop chronic pain after back surgery?
- Can a brace and targeted exercises ease spondylolisthesis pain?
- Simple tube after spine surgery may cut complications
- 3D-Printed spinal cages could revolutionize back surgery