New study pits two pain blocks against each other for spine surgery relief

NCT ID NCT06398600

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two ultrasound-guided pain blocks—caudal block and quadratus lumborum plane block—in 111 adults undergoing lumbar spine surgery. The goal was to see which provides better pain relief and reduces the need for opioid painkillers. Researchers measured how long it took before patients first asked for extra pain medicine and their pain scores over 24 hours.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
ultrasound-guided caudal block and quadratus lumborum plane block (procedures)
What this could lead to
If one block proves better, it could offer more effective pain control after spine surgery, reducing the need for opioids.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study comparing two techniques; results may not apply to all patients or surgeries, and both blocks carry rare risks like infection or nerve injury.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

111 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

May 2024

Finished

Sep 2024

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 60 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult patients (18-60 years old), of either gender undergoing elective lumbar spine fixation surgery. 2. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Include patients who refuse. 2. Patients with contraindications to regional anesthesia (eg, local infection at site of injection, coagulation abnormalities). 3. Patients with spinal deformities or previous lumbar disc surgeries. 4. Allergy to local anesthetics, mental disorders as well as drug abuse. 5. BMI more than 35

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Facet joint hypertrophy are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Fayoum University hospital

    El Fayoum Qesm, Faiyum Governorate, 63514, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.