Neck pain relief showdown: nerve stretching vs. muscle strengthening
NCT ID NCT07604935
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested two physical therapy techniques—nerve flossing and deep neck flexor strengthening—in 62 adults with cervical spinal stenosis. The goal was to see which method better reduces pain, improves neck movement, and helps with daily activities. Participants did their assigned exercises three times a week, and researchers measured pain and disability before and after treatment.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
62 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2026
- Finished
-
May 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 50 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 20-50 years, both male and female. * Clinical and radiological (MRI) diagnosis of cervical spinal stenosis. * Cervical pain with or without radiating to the upper limb. * At least one neurological sign, such as sensory disturbance, muscle weakness or diminished reflexes. * Symptoms present for more than 4 weeks but less than 6 months. * Ability to understand and follow exercise instructions. * VAS pain score ≥ 3/10 at baseline. Exclusion Criteria: * History of cervical spine surgery * Recent trauma, fracture, or cervical instability. * History of disc herniation involving surgery. * Other neurological or musculoskeletal conditions, including peripheral neuropathy, thoracic outlet syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis. * Pregnancy. * Recent medication use that may impact nerve function (e.g., systemic steroids).
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cervical spinal stenosis are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Green International University
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a nasal spray shield aging brains from Post-Surgery confusion?
- Spine surgery secrets: opening angle may determine recovery
- Can a tailored surgical approach improve outcomes for spinal stenosis?
- Can barbed sutures improve healing in obese neck surgery patients?
- Spine Surgery's hidden aftermath: tracking swallowing and voice troubles
- New cage for neck surgery under observation – no treatment given