Which stretch wins? new study tests two neck pain therapies Head-to-Head

NCT ID NCT07637812

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two manual therapy techniques—Reciprocal Inhibition and Passive PNF Stretching—for people with chronic neck pain from cervical spondylitis. Sixty participants will receive 12 sessions over 4 weeks. Researchers will measure pain, disability, and neck movement to see which technique works better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

Reciprocal Inhibition Technique and Passive PNF Stretching

What this could lead to

If one technique proves more effective, it could offer a better non-drug option for reducing neck pain and improving mobility in people with cervical spondylitis.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage trial with only 60 participants. Results may not apply to everyone, and the study does not test long-term effects or compare against no treatment.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CERVICAL SPONDYLITIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Neck Pain spondylitis spondylosis, cervical

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • The University of Faisalabad

    Faisalābad, Punjab Province, 3800, Pakistan