Dental accuracy showdown: old vs. new jaw tracking methods
NCT ID NCT07184346
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This study will test how accurate three different methods are for recording the jaw's natural resting position (centric relation) in 20 healthy adults. The methods include a traditional bite registration, a digital intraoral scanner, and an optical jaw tracker. Researchers will compare the precision of each technique to see which one gives the most reliable results for dental treatments like crowns or dentures.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help dentists choose the most accurate method for recording jaw position, improving dental restorations and bite alignment.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage study with only 20 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. It measures accuracy in a lab setting, not real-world treatment outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CENTRIC RELATION REGISTRATION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.