Which surgery after miscarriage boosts future pregnancy?
NCT ID NCT02201732
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares hysteroscopy (using a tiny camera) to standard curettage (scraping) for removing leftover tissue after an incomplete miscarriage. It involved 577 women under 45 who wanted to get pregnant again. The main goal was to see which procedure leads to more successful pregnancies beyond 22 weeks.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Hysteroscopy (a procedure using a small camera to remove tissue from the uterus)
- What this could lead to
- If hysteroscopy works better, it could improve future pregnancy chances after a miscarriage.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed study, but results may not apply to all women. Both procedures carry risks like infection or injury.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for INCOMPLETE MISCARRIAGE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Centre hospitalier intercommunal de poissy-saint germain en Laye
Poissy, 78300, France