Gum surgery showdown: which technique covers exposed roots best?
NCT ID NCT07239180
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two surgical techniques to treat single gum recession defects, where the gum has pulled away from the tooth. One method uses a tunnel without cuts, the other adds a small cut. The goal is to see which covers the exposed root better and is less invasive. The trial will involve 24 adults with at least 2 mm of gum recession.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- surgical procedure (tunneled coronally advanced flap or modified coronally advanced tunnel with connective tissue graft)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could identify a less invasive surgical option for covering exposed tooth roots, improving gum health and appearance.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 24 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both procedures are surgical and carry risks like infection or incomplete coverage.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SINGLE RECESSION DEFECTS (RT2) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.