AI vs. anesthesiologists: who rates surgery risk better when frailty is considered?

NCT ID NCT07399938

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at how anesthesiologists and artificial intelligence (AI) models rate surgical risk using the ASA classification system. Researchers wanted to see if adding a frailty score (a measure of weakness and vulnerability) changes those ratings. They observed 200 adult patients scheduled for elective surgery and compared the ratings from four doctors and two AI models. The goal was to understand differences in how humans and AI think about risk, and whether frailty should be included more formally.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PERIOPERATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Frailty

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Istanbul Provincial Health Directorate Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital

    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)