AI vs. anesthesiologists: who rates surgery risk better when frailty is considered?
NCT ID NCT07399938
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at how anesthesiologists and artificial intelligence (AI) models rate surgical risk using the ASA classification system. Researchers wanted to see if adding a frailty score (a measure of weakness and vulnerability) changes those ratings. They observed 200 adult patients scheduled for elective surgery and compared the ratings from four doctors and two AI models. The goal was to understand differences in how humans and AI think about risk, and whether frailty should be included more formally.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PERIOPERATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Istanbul Provincial Health Directorate Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)