Which surgical tool causes less tissue damage? a Head-to-Head test

NCT ID NCT07765576

First seen Aug 14, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026

Summary

This study compares two electrocautery tips—blunt and Utah—to see which causes less thermal damage to fat, fibrotic, and muscle tissue. Tissue samples are taken from patients undergoing surgical removal of gluteal biopolymers (injected fillers). The tissue is cut in the lab using different tips, power settings, and modes, and the depth of damage is measured under a microscope. The goal is to identify which tool and settings minimize tissue injury, potentially improving surgical outcomes.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Blunt electrocautery tip versus Utah electrocautery tip
What this could lead to
If one tip causes less tissue damage, it could guide surgeons to choose tools that reduce post-surgical scarring and improve recovery.
What could go wrong
This is a small lab-based study on tissue samples, not a patient treatment trial. Results may not translate to real-world surgical outcomes.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for FOREIGN BODIES are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Foreign Bodies Foreign-Body Reaction Granuloma, Foreign-Body

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Clinica Bioderma

    Medellín, Antioquia, 050022, Colombia

    Contact Email: •••••@•••••

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.