Which surgical tool causes less tissue damage? a Head-to-Head test
NCT ID NCT07765576
First seen Aug 14, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026
Summary
This study compares two electrocautery tips—blunt and Utah—to see which causes less thermal damage to fat, fibrotic, and muscle tissue. Tissue samples are taken from patients undergoing surgical removal of gluteal biopolymers (injected fillers). The tissue is cut in the lab using different tips, power settings, and modes, and the depth of damage is measured under a microscope. The goal is to identify which tool and settings minimize tissue injury, potentially improving surgical outcomes.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Blunt electrocautery tip versus Utah electrocautery tip
- What this could lead to
- If one tip causes less tissue damage, it could guide surgeons to choose tools that reduce post-surgical scarring and improve recovery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small lab-based study on tissue samples, not a patient treatment trial. Results may not translate to real-world surgical outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for FOREIGN BODIES are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Clinica Bioderma
Medellín, Antioquia, 050022, Colombia
Contact Email: •••••@•••••
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.