Spinal stretching technique may ease arm pain from repetitive tasks
NCT ID NCT07703332
First seen Jul 14, 2026 · Last updated Jul 15, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two stretching methods for people with upper limb overuse syndrome, a condition caused by repetitive activities like typing or manual labor. One group will perform a spinal decompression technique called ELDOA, while the other does active isolated stretching. Researchers will measure pain, arm function, and nerve mobility after three weeks of treatment.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Elongation longitudinal decoaptation ostéo-articulaire (ELDOA) and active isolated stretching (AIS)
- What this could lead to
- If ELDOA proves more effective than stretching, it could offer a targeted therapy for upper limb overuse syndrome, reducing pain and improving function.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with 84 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The intervention is also technique-dependent, which could limit reproducibility.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 84 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Jul 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 50 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * All adult age group (20-50 years) patients with clinical symptoms and signs of upper limb overuse syndrome with median nerve were included in the study (Latif et al., 2022). * Participants included individuals engaged in repetitive upper-limb activities, such as office workers, manual laborers, athletes and students, who demonstrated median nerve involvement associated with repetitive task performance (Descatha et al., 2017). * Persistent pain in the upper limb, pain intensity score from 3-7 on the Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), discomfort and functional limitations in daily activities, occupational tasks or recreational activities were deemed to be indications of eligibility for participation in the study (Hawker et al., 2011). * Participants with persistent nature symptoms (3 months or more than 3 months) are included in the study to secure homogenous study population (Nicholas et al., 2019). * Willing to give their informed consent and take part. Exclusion Criteria: * Trauma, surgery, fracture or dislocation of the upper limb in the last six months or less were excluded to minimize the possibility of studying the acute tissue healing on the results of this study (Cools et al., 2021). * Other neurological conditions (e.g., peripheral or central nervous system disorders, systemic neuropathies, cervical radiculopathy, or other neurological disorders) were excluded for participation (Padua et al., 2020). * The potential effect of rheumatologic or inflammatory musculoskeletal disorders (rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, or other systemic inflammatory diseases) on pain and functional status was also a reason for exclusion (Smolen et al., 2020). * No corticosteroid uses or prior physical therapy within 3 months to reduce the potentially confounding effect of prior therapeutic interventions on study outcomes (Kolasinski et al., 2020). * Participants were excluded from the study if they had any contraindications to manual therapy treatment that could affect the safety of the intervention (e.g., vascular, severe osteoporosis, malignancy, acute infection, other conditions) (Puentedura et al., 2012).
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Upper limb overuse syndrome are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Dr . Rubina Zulfqar
RECRUITINGFaisalabad, Punjab Province, 38000, Pakistan