Digital vs. goo: which dental impression is more accurate?
NCT ID NCT07252869
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested how accurate digital scanners and traditional gooey impressions are for making dental implants. Researchers compared two digital scanners and a standard putty-like material against a high-precision lab scan. They used 51 dental models from 42 patients to see which method matched best.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If digital scanners prove accurate enough, dentists may rely more on them for implants, reducing patient discomfort and improving workflow.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with 51 models. Results may not apply to all patients or scanners, and real-world factors could affect accuracy.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF NONINVASIVE MEASUREMENT are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Clinica Odontoiatrica Giorgio Vogel (Università degli studi di Milano)
Milan, Italy, Italy