Digital vs. goo: which dental impression is more accurate?

NCT ID NCT07252869

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tested how accurate digital scanners and traditional gooey impressions are for making dental implants. Researchers compared two digital scanners and a standard putty-like material against a high-precision lab scan. They used 51 dental models from 42 patients to see which method matched best.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If digital scanners prove accurate enough, dentists may rely more on them for implants, reducing patient discomfort and improving workflow.

What could go wrong

This is a small, completed study with 51 models. Results may not apply to all patients or scanners, and real-world factors could affect accuracy.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF NONINVASIVE MEASUREMENT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Clinica Odontoiatrica Giorgio Vogel (Università degli studi di Milano)

    Milan, Italy, Italy