Dental shield test: can a simple coating save Kids' weak molars?

NCT ID NCT07443878

Summary

This study tested two different dental coatings to see which works better at preventing breakdown in children's permanent molars that have weak enamel. Researchers compared a resin infiltrant (Icon®) against a fluoride varnish (Clinpro XT®) in 17 children aged 6-13. The goal was to see which treatment better protects these vulnerable teeth from developing cavities or structural damage over six months.

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for MOLAR HYPOMINERALIZATION, INCISOR are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí

    San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, Mexico

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.