Dental implant showdown: which healing cap wins for stability?

NCT ID NCT07687615

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 07, 2026 · Last updated Jul 08, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two ways to cover a dental implant right after placement: a healing abutment (one-stage) versus a cover screw (two-stage). The goal is to see which method leads to better early stability and bone integration. Adults needing at least two implants will have each method tested in different sides of the mouth, and stability is measured over three months using a special device.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If one method proves better, it could guide dentists to choose the best approach for faster and more stable dental implant healing.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 50 participants, so results may not apply to all patients or implant types. The difference between groups might be small or not clinically meaningful.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

50 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Feb 2025

Finished

Mar 2026

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 65 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged ≥18 years. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II. Able and willing to comply with the study protocol and follow-up schedule. Required at least two dental implants in contralateral or symmetrical edentulous sites. Implant sites free of active infection or acute periodontal disease. Adequate oral hygiene. Sufficient bone volume for placement of a standard-diameter implant with at least 1.5 mm of surrounding peri-implant bone. Keratinized mucosal width ≥2 mm. Soft tissue thickness ≥2 mm. Written informed consent provided. Exclusion Criteria: * Systemic diseases or medical conditions contraindicating implant surgery. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c \>10%). Current intravenous antiresorptive therapy. History of head and neck radiotherapy. Immunosuppressive therapy. Active malignancy. Uncontrolled hypertension. Advanced hepatic or renal insufficiency. Pregnancy. Poor oral hygiene. Active oral infection. Requirement for bone augmentation before implant placement. Inadequate bone volume. Unfavorable peri-implant soft tissue phenotype. Primary implant stability \<20 Ncm at implant placement.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cover screw are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Faculty of Dentistry, Adıyaman University

    Adıyaman, Merkez, 02030, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.