Dental filling showdown: which technique lasts longer?
NCT ID NCT06183320
First seen May 15, 2026 · Last updated May 15, 2026
Summary
This study tested two methods for filling deep cavities in back teeth. 38 adults each received two fillings: one using a flowable bulk fill composite and the other using a standard layered composite. The goal was to see which method leads to fewer failures, stains, or fractures over five years. Results will help dentists choose the best approach for long-lasting fillings.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE OF MARGINAL INTEGRITY are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Universidade Federal Fluminense - School of Dentistry
Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, 28625-650, Brazil
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.