New study tracks COVID vaccine durability in chronic illness patients
NCT ID NCT05313087
First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This completed study followed 360 adults and children with chronic respiratory and other medical conditions to see how their immune systems responded to COVID-19 vaccines over 18 months. Researchers measured antibody, T cell, and B cell levels before vaccination and every 3 months after. The goal was to understand how long vaccine protection lasts in people with ongoing health issues.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- COVID-19 vaccine
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help doctors understand how long vaccine protection lasts in people with chronic health conditions, guiding booster shot timing.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational study, not a treatment trial. It measures immune responses but does not test a new vaccine or therapy. Results may not apply to all patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ASTHMA are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
National Jewish Health
Denver, Colorado, 80206, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A good Night's sleep: could a simple program ease Cancer's toll on rest?
- Smart breathing machines at home: a new way to predict COPD crises?
- Can tracking severe asthma over time unlock better treatments?
- Could sitting up make radiation therapy more comfortable?
- Can we predict dangerous side effects when combining radiation and immunotherapy?
- Family history as a shield: can culturally tailored guidance cut cancer risk?