C-section scar pregnancy: which treatment is safer?

NCT ID NCT07166627

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This study compares two procedures for treating type II cesarean scar pregnancy, a rare condition where a pregnancy implants in a previous C-section scar. 68 women in their first trimester will be randomly assigned to either surgical removal or ultrasound-guided evacuation. The goal is to see which method is safer and more effective, looking at outcomes like bleeding and recurrence.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If this trial succeeds, it could show which procedure is safer and more effective for treating cesarean scar pregnancy, helping doctors choose the best option.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage study with only 68 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Both procedures carry risks like bleeding or recurrence.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CESAREAN SCAR PREGNANCY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Sohag University Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Sohag, Egypt

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••