Surgeons test new path to heal broken jaws
NCT ID NCT07403708
Summary
This study compared two different surgical methods for fixing a broken jaw joint (subcondylar fracture). Twenty patients were randomly assigned to have surgery using either a newer approach (Transmasseteric Anteroparotid) or a more traditional one (Retromandibular Transparotid). The goal was to see which method was better at avoiding facial nerve damage, reducing pain, and improving patient satisfaction with the scar over a 3-month follow-up.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CONDYLAR FRACTURES are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Alexandria university
Alexandria, Egypt
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.