Dental study pits two retraction methods Head-to-Head
NCT ID NCT05963438
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This completed trial compared two orthodontic techniques—en-masse retraction and two-step retraction—for moving front teeth backward after upper premolar extractions. Eighty patients aged 18 to 25 with class II bite issues received mini-implants as anchors. The goal was to see which method better affects tooth position in terms of forward-backward, vertical, and side-to-side dimensions.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- anterior retraction procedure
- What this could lead to
- If this shows one method is better, it could help orthodontists choose the most effective technique for moving front teeth back using mini-implants.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial focused on measuring tooth movement, not on curing a disease. Results may not apply to all patients or other dental conditions.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for EN-MASSE RETRACTION TO TWO- STEPS RETRACTION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Dow University of Health Sciences
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan