Toothache study tests best way to teach patients and whether AI can help doctors
NCT ID NCT07698847
First seen Jul 13, 2026 · Last updated Jul 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial compares three methods of educating adults who come to a dental clinic with toothache: a verbal explanation, a leaflet, or a short video. Researchers measure changes in patients' knowledge, misconceptions about antibiotics, and anxiety right before and after the education. The study also tests whether an artificial intelligence tool can reliably create a brief summary of the patient's complaint to help clinicians.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show which patient education method works best for toothache care and whether AI can help clinicians quickly understand patient complaints.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center study measuring immediate changes only, so results may not apply to other settings or predict long-term outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
120 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2025
- Finished
-
Apr 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Reported pain of at least 1 point on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS ≥ 1) at presentation, * Were aged 18-65 years, * Had sufficient cognitive capacity to complete the questionnaires, and * Provided written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Reported no pain at presentation (NRS = 0) or presented electively/asymptomatically, * Required immediate emergency clinical evaluation due to signs suggestive of urgent intervention (e.g., marked diffuse swelling, dysphagia, dyspnea), * Had substantial communication or cognitive difficulties preventing completion of the measures, or * Were repeat participants (i.e., the same patient re-entering the study).
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dental pain are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Cukurova University
Adana, Sarıçam, 01250, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a VR headset replace the Dentist's drill of dread?
- Could light replace the Dentist's needle for kids?
- Can a parent really know their Child's pain? a dental study puts it to the test
- Could a steroid injection make root canals less painful?
- New root canal filling may reduce Post-Procedure pain and swelling
- New dental MRI could replace x-rays for safer checkups