New study aims to make dental extractions Pain-Free by testing better anesthetics
NCT ID NCT07597408
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two local anesthetics (articaine and buffered lidocaine) for extracting upper teeth. The goal is to see if one can numb the tooth effectively without needing a separate, painful injection into the palate. Fifty healthy adults needing extraction of a matching pair of upper teeth will receive each anesthetic in separate sessions, and researchers will measure pain, numbness onset, and duration.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- articaine hydrochloride and buffered lidocaine hydrochloride
- What this could lead to
- If one anesthetic works better, it could make dental extractions less painful and reduce patient fear by avoiding a separate injection into the palate.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early study (50 people) comparing two well-known drugs, so the results may not apply to everyone or change practice dramatically.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for A COMPARSION BETWEEN ARTICAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND BUFFERED LIDOCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Latakia university
Latakia, Syria