Smaller chest drain may speed recovery after lung cancer surgery
NCT ID NCT07827885
First seen Sep 18, 2026 ยท Last updated Sep 18, 2026
Summary
Researchers compare two chest drain sizes, 20-Fr and 24-Fr, in people having part of a lung removed for early-stage lung cancer. After surgery, each participant receives one of the two drains to clear fluid and air from the chest. The trial tracks complications such as collapsed lung and fluid buildup, plus pain, air leaks, how long the drain stays in, and hospital stay. The goal is to learn whether a smaller drain helps patients recover with fewer problems.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- chest drainage tube size (20-Fr versus 24-Fr)
- What this could lead to
- If a smaller drain works as well, patients could have less pain and shorter hospital stays after lung surgery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center study of 80 people, so the results may not apply to all lung surgery patients. Drain size is only one of many factors that affect recovery.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
80 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jul 2025
- Finished
-
Feb 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy with systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy for lung cancer using a uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic approach. * FEV1/FVC \>70%. * Clinical stage up to and including stage IIB according to the eighth or ninth edition of the TNM classification. * No morphological evidence of macrobullous emphysema on computed tomography. Exclusion Criteria: * Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. * Previous ipsilateral pulmonary resection. * FEV1/FVC \<70%. * Clinical stage beyond IIB according to the eighth or ninth edition of the TNM classification. * Macrobullous emphysema on computed tomography. * pregnant and breastfeeding women
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Non-small cell lung cancer are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
Rome, Lazio, 00142, Italy
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Two-Drug combo targets stubborn KRAS lung cancer
- Gut bacteria may hold clues to why some cancer treatments work better
- Breath-Tracking sensor aims to sharpen lung cancer scans
- Can PET scan signals predict who beats lung cancer with immunotherapy?
- Two-Drug combo takes aim at Hard-to-Treat lung cancer
- Can a blood test tell which lung cancer patients can skip chemo?