Spine surgery showdown: which fixation method offers better outcomes for neck pain?
NCT ID NCT07713927
First seen Jul 20, 2026 · Last updated Jul 21, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial compares two surgical techniques for treating cervical degenerative disc disease: using a stand-alone cage versus a cage-screw fixation system. Both aim to relieve pain and improve function by removing the damaged disc and fusing the vertebrae. The study measures pain levels, swallowing difficulties, and spinal alignment in 20 adults who have not improved with non-surgical treatments.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using either a stand-alone cage or a cage-screw fixation system
- What this could lead to
- If one technique proves superior, it could reduce complications like swallowing difficulty and improve recovery for people with cervical disc disease.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 20 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both surgeries carry risks such as infection, nerve damage, or implant failure.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
20 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jun 2026
- Expected to finish
-
Nov 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 70 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * • Symptomatic cervical disc disease. * Single- or multiple-level cervical degenerative disease. * MRI-confirmed cervical disc prolapse or spondylosis. * Failure of conservative treatment Exclusion Criteria: * • Previous cervical spine surgery. * Cervical trauma. * Cervical Infection. * Cervical Tumors. * Congenital cervical anomalies. * Severe Cervical osteoporosis. * Rheumatoid arthritis. * Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament requiring another approach. * Severe systemic illness preventing surgery.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cervical degenerative disease are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Sohag University
Sohag, 82516, Egypt