Spine surgery showdown: which fixation method offers better outcomes for neck pain?
NCT ID NCT07713927
First seen Jul 20, 2026 · Last updated Jul 21, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial compares two surgical techniques for treating cervical degenerative disc disease: using a stand-alone cage versus a cage-screw fixation system. Both aim to relieve pain and improve function by removing the damaged disc and fusing the vertebrae. The study measures pain levels, swallowing difficulties, and spinal alignment in 20 adults who have not improved with non-surgical treatments.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using either a stand-alone cage or a cage-screw fixation system
- What this could lead to
- If one technique proves superior, it could reduce complications like swallowing difficulty and improve recovery for people with cervical disc disease.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 20 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both surgeries carry risks such as infection, nerve damage, or implant failure.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CERVICAL DEGENERATIVE DISEASE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Sohag University
Sohag, 82516, Egypt