Digital dentures may beat traditional ones in tooth health study

NCT ID NCT07215208

Not yet recruiting Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Cairo University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two ways of making metal frameworks for partial dentures in the lower jaw: one using digital design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM), and the other using traditional methods. The goal is to see which approach better supports the health of the teeth that hold the denture (abutment teeth) and improves how the teeth fit together when biting. The trial will involve 22 adults with a specific type of missing teeth (Kennedy class III) and will measure tooth mobility and gum bleeding.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: CAD/CAM metallic partial denture framework
What this could lead to: If successful, this could show that digitally made denture frameworks are better for tooth and gum health than traditional ones.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study with only 22 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. It compares two methods but doesn't test a new treatment.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for OCCLUSION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Bites and Stings Prosthesis Failure vascular occlusion disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

OCCLUSION PROSTHESIS DURABILITY

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.