Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

New study tests better ways to build jawbone for dental implants

NCT ID NCT07171476

Disease control Sponsor: Suez Canal University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested two surgical techniques—bone ring and tent pole—against standard guided bone regeneration to improve bone around dental implants placed immediately after tooth extraction. Twenty-four people with thin buccal bone received one of the three treatments. The researchers measured implant stability and bone changes using CT scans right after surgery and six months later. The goal was to find which method best preserves bone for long-lasting implants.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
bone graft (autogenous bone chips or bone ring) and resorbable membrane
What this could lead to
If successful, these techniques could help people with thin jawbone get dental implants that last longer and look better.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study with only 24 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Bone grafting procedures carry risks like infection, graft displacement, or implant failure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

24 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Mar 2021

Finished

Aug 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

21 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with physical status classified as ASA class I and class II having single rooted tooth with buccal bone defect extending less than 3 mm from the alveolar bone crest which requires replacement. * There is bone extending at least 3mm beyond the root apex. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with physical status classified as ASA class III, class IV or class V. * Buccal bone defect extending more than 5 mm from the alveolar bone crest. * Smoker patient. * Presence of acute or chronic infection.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Class II extraction socket are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Class II extraction socket Defected buccal bone

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Suez Canal University

    Ismailia, Ismailia Governorate, 41511, Egypt