Jawbone showdown: which graft technique wins?

NCT ID NCT07210385

First seen Oct 31, 2025

Summary

This study tests two methods for rebuilding the upper jaw where bone is too thin for dental implants. One method uses a sticky mix of the patient's own bone and cow bone; the other uses a bone shell technique. Thirty adults will be randomly assigned to one method, and after 6 months, doctors will measure how much new bone formed and how healthy it is.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for MAXILLARY AUGMENTATION IN HORIZONTAL BONE DEFECT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Cairo University

    Al Manyal, Giza Governorate, 12613, Egypt

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

bone graft (autogenous bone chips mixed with bovine bone)

What this could lead to

If successful, this could identify a better technique for rebuilding jawbone, making dental implants possible for more people.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage trial with only 30 participants. Results may not apply to everyone, and both techniques carry risks like infection or graft failure.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.