Can a mix of online and Hands-On training beat traditional classroom teaching for emergency heart care?

NCT ID NCT07670637

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This completed study compared two ways of teaching Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) to 95 doctors and nurses in China. One group took a blended course with online self-study plus hands-on practice, while the other group had a traditional all-in-person class. The researchers looked at first-attempt certification pass rates and costs to see which method works better and is more affordable.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If blended learning proves as effective and cheaper, hospitals could adopt it to train more staff efficiently.

What could go wrong

This is a small, single-center study with 95 participants, so results may not apply to all settings. The training method does not change patient outcomes directly.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR LIFE SUPPORT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Shanghai East Hospital Affiliated To Tongji University

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200120, China