Light vs. zaps: which works better for Bell's palsy?
NCT ID NCT07266636
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two non-drug treatments—light therapy (photobiomodulation) and electrical stimulation—to see which better helps people with Bell's palsy regain facial movement. About 34 adults with moderate to severe facial weakness will receive one of the treatments along with standard facial exercises. The goal is to find the most effective way to reduce disability and improve recovery.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BELL'S PALSY are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can targeted exercises and nerve stretching restore a symmetrical smile?
- Facial exercises or mirror tricks: which works better for Bell's palsy?
- Laser therapy shows promise for chronic Bell's palsy
- Can electric acupuncture waves restore a paralyzed face?
- AI could take the guesswork out of Bell's palsy recovery
- Can tiny needles soothe dry eyes after facial paralysis?