Heart valve surgery showdown: which replacement lasts longer?
NCT ID NCT07210541
Summary
This study compared two surgical options for replacing a worn-out aortic heart valve in patients aged 60-74. Researchers tracked 93 patients who received either a stented biological valve or a donor tissue valve (allograft) to see which was safer and more effective over time. They measured complications, survival rates, and how long each valve lasted before needing another surgery.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BIOPROSTHESIS FAILURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.