Battle of the smile fixers: which treatment brightens Fluorosis-Stained teeth best?
NCT ID NCT07707349
First seen Jul 16, 2026 · Last updated Jul 17, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial compares two minimally invasive treatments—Antivet and Opalustre—for improving the appearance of mild enamel fluorosis, a condition that causes tooth discoloration. Adults aged 20 to 35 with mild fluorosis on their front teeth are randomly assigned to receive one of the two treatments. Tooth color is measured before and after treatment using a special device to see which option works better.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Antivet (microabrasion) or Opalustre (enamel microabrasion)
- What this could lead to
- If one treatment proves more effective, it could offer a better option for improving the appearance of discolored teeth due to fluorosis.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small trial with only 59 participants, and results may not apply to everyone. Both treatments are minimally invasive, but individual results vary.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ENAMEL DISCOLORATION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
October University for Modern Sciences and Arts
Giza, Sixth of October, 12566, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.