New study tests best way to train nurses for Life-Threatening allergic reactions
NCT ID NCT07388329
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two teaching methods—rapid cycle deliberate practice and traditional debriefing—for nursing students learning to manage anaphylactic shock. About 80 third-year nursing students will participate, and their knowledge, performance, self-confidence, and satisfaction will be measured. The goal is to find out which training approach better prepares students for real-life emergencies.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for NURSING EDUCATION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Baskent University
Ankara, Ankara, 06790, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Practice makes perfect: could a fake breast help real moms breastfeed better?
- Can a 14-Week workshop turn nursing students into innovators?
- Can a short online course make future nurses safer with digital health data?
- AI-Powered flipped classrooms could transform how nurses learn communication skills
- Nursing Students' AI anxiety under the microscope
- Chatbot coach boosts student Nurses' confidence in pediatric dosing