AI vs. doctors: who reads brain data better in spine surgery?

NCT ID NCT07650604

Not yet recruiting Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Antalya Health Sciences University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study will test whether artificial intelligence programs like ChatGPT can interpret brain monitoring data (BIS) as accurately as experienced clinicians during spine surgery. Researchers will compare AI responses to those of two doctors in 63 patients. The goal is to see if AI can reliably support clinical decisions in the operating room.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Artificial intelligence programs (ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot)
What this could lead to: If successful, this could show that AI can reliably assist in monitoring brain activity during surgery, potentially supporting clinical decision-making.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage methodological study, not a treatment trial. AI interpretations may not match real-world clinical judgment, and results may not apply to other surgeries or settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ARTIFICAL INTELLIGENCE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

vertebral column disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

ARTIFICAL INTELLIGENCE BISPECTRAL INDEX SPINE

Contacts and locations

Locations

University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital

Antalya, Muratpaşa, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.