AI vs. anesthesiologist: who assesses surgery risk better?

NCT ID NCT07364942

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested whether an artificial intelligence system can assess risks before surgery as well as anesthesiologists do. Researchers compared the AI's risk ratings to those of doctors for 500 adults scheduled for elective surgery. The goal was to see if AI could be a helpful tool in planning safer anesthesia and surgery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that AI can reliably help doctors assess surgical risks, potentially making preoperative evaluations faster and more consistent.
What could go wrong
This is an observational study, not a treatment trial. The AI may not match anesthesiologist judgment in all cases, and findings may not apply to all hospitals or patient groups.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

500 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Mar 2025

Finished

Oct 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

The study population consists of adult patients aged 18 years and older who were scheduled for elective surgical procedures and underwent routine preoperative evaluation at a tertiary care university hospital. Preoperative risk assessments performed by anesthesiologists were compared with artificial intelligence-based risk assessments using the same clinical data.

Ages

18 to 99 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * \- Adult patients aged 18 years and older * Patients scheduled for elective surgery under anesthesia * Patients who underwent routine preoperative evaluation * Availability of complete preoperative clinical data required for both anesthesiologist and artificial intelligence-based assessment Exclusion Criteria: * \- Patients younger than 18 years * Emergency surgery cases * Patients with incomplete or missing preoperative clinical data * Patients who declined participation or whose data could not be evaluated

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Preoperative risk assessment are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Trabzon Faculty of Medicine, Kanuni Training and Research Hospital,

    Trabzon, Trabzon, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.