AI vs. templates: which is faster for orthopedic notes?
NCT ID NCT07489469
First seen Mar 29, 2026 · Last updated May 13, 2026 · Updated 9 times
Summary
This study tested whether an AI scribe or routine dictation templates are better for documenting orthopedic consultations. About 200 adults having hip or knee replacement surgery took part. Researchers measured how long documentation took, how accurate it was, and how satisfied patients were. The goal is to find ways to make clinical documentation faster and easier.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CLINICAL DOCUMENTATION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Orthopaedic Associates
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7J3C1, Canada
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.