AI takes on pap smears: could it match human experts?
NCT ID NCT06767111
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This study compares a new AI-assisted digital system to the standard manual method for reading Pap tests. About 4,600 cervical cell samples will be reviewed both ways to see if the AI system is just as good at detecting abnormal cells. The goal is to determine if the AI can help cytotechnologists work more efficiently without sacrificing accuracy.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Techcyte SureView Cervical Cytology System (AI-assisted digital imaging device)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could provide a faster, AI-assisted way to read Pap tests that is as accurate as the current manual method, potentially improving lab efficiency.
- What could go wrong
- This is a large study but still testing a new device; it may not prove non-inferior to standard practice, and AI-assisted reading could miss abnormalities or increase false positives.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 4,596 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Dec 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2025
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Samples collected in the United States
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Glass slides with cervical cytology specimens prepared with Hologic ThinPrep according to the pap test manufacturers Instructions for Use (IFU) using any of Hologic's processors (i.e. ThinPrep2000, ThinPrep 3000, ThinPrep 5000, ThinPrep Genesis). OR Glass slides with cervical cytology specimens prepared with BD SurePath according to the pap test manufacturers IFU using any of BD's processors (i.e. BD Totalys MultiProcessor, BD Totalys SlidePrep, BD PrepStain). * Slide has the original diagnosis available. * Slides that fit within the required sample size strata using the sample collection procedure. * Glass slides with QR code, barcodes, or plain text labels. * Glass slides with coverslips. * Slides that are 5 years old or less, except where rare specimens require it. Those specimens will have to be reviewed for degradation per the sample collection procedure. * Only one sample per patient and all are to be collected, processed and scanned. Exclusion Criteria: * Broken or cracked slides. * Slides with air bubbles or scratched, cracked or broken/missing cover slips. * Slides with markings (e.g., handwritten pen marking) that cannot be removed according to standard laboratory procedures. * Degraded slides (ex: slides whose stains have lost color or specimens that are not intact). * Glass slides with cervical cytology specimens prepared with methods other than Hologic ThinPrep or BD SurePath. * Glass slides with specimens other than cervical cytology specimens. * Slides from the same patient.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cervical cytology are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Techcyte
Orem, Utah, 84057, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.