Dental scanner showdown: which 3D tech wins for Full-Arch implants?
NCT ID NCT07320729
First seen Jan 09, 2026 · Last updated May 14, 2026 · Updated 22 times
Summary
This study compares two 3D scanning methods used to take digital impressions of dental implants for full-arch replacements. Four patients with complete tooth loss in one jaw received 4-6 implants, and both a standard intraoral scanner and a photogrammetry scanner were tested for accuracy and speed. The goal is to see which method gives more precise implant positions, which could help dentists choose the best tool for immediate same-day implant-supported teeth.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for EDENTULISM are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Assiut University
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71111, Egypt
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.