Could a simple 3D ultrasound replace a surgical scope for bleeding diagnosis?

NCT ID NCT07309692

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two methods for finding the cause of abnormal bleeding in women aged 40-55: a non-invasive 3D ultrasound and a more invasive hysteroscopy (a camera inserted into the uterus). Researchers will check how accurate the 3D ultrasound is compared to hysteroscopy. The goal is to see if the simpler ultrasound can reliably diagnose the problem, potentially avoiding the need for a surgical procedure.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If successful, 3D ultrasound could become a reliable, less invasive first step for diagnosing perimenopausal bleeding, reducing the need for hysteroscopy.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage diagnostic comparison study. 3D ultrasound may not be accurate enough to replace hysteroscopy, and results may not apply to all patients.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PERIMENOPAUSAL BLEEDING are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Sohag University

    RECRUITING

    Sohag, Egypt

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••